Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Doll

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 2012No. 20110097PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Macintosh Doll appeals a district court criminal judgment entered after- a jury found him guilty of gross sexual imposition. Doll argues (1) he did not receive a fair trial because he was tried with a code-fendant, (2) he was unfairly prejudiced by the testimony of a sexual assault nurse, (3) the district court erred by denying his motion for mistrial due to a sequestration order violation and (4) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] On March 13, 2010⅛ law enforcement received a report that a 14-year-old girl had run away. While…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Nelson v. O'NEILSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. State v. HernandezNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. KloseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. RamseyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. DopplerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Brewer v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Hayden v. Medcenter One, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. PavlicekNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. ThomasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API