Legal Opinion

Scharlin v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 31, 1992No. G012203PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOORE, J.

Joseph Scharlin filed a petition for a writ of mandate seeking to vacate respondent superior court’s order finding his proposed challenge to the validity of an amendment to a trust would violate the no contest clauses of both the original trust agreement and the amendment. We issued an alternative writ and granted a hearing to determine whether a beneficiary under the decedent’s trust of a joint estate plan forfeits his or her interest by challenging the validity of an amendment to the survivor’s trust under that estate plan. We conclude the writ should be granted.

Facts

In July…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Robbins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Estate of HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. In Re Estate of BerglandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Estate of BasoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Johnson v. GreenelshCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Ike v. DoolittleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Graham v. LenziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Brown v. LabowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Meyer v. MeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API