Legal Opinion

Ike v. Doolittle

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 27, 1998No. D026752PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NARES, J.—

Introduction

This case requires us to independently interpret language in both a declaration of trust (the Trust) which created an inter vivos trust known as the Ike Family Trust, and in a related property agreement (Property Agreement) contemporaneously executed by trustors Virgil W. Ike (Virgil) and his wife Jeannette B. Ike (Jeannette), both of whom are deceased. Following the death of Virgil, who had survived Jeannette, disputes arose among the trustors’ respective designated beneficiaries and Jeannette’s intestate heirs over distribution of the trust estate.

This matter…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Church Home for Children of Protestant Episcopal Church v. LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Moxley v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Adams v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of PowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. Cairns v. CairnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Radin v. Jewish National FundCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Carlson v. Sweeney, Dabagia, Donoghue, Thorne, Janes & PagosIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Giammarrusco v. SimonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API