Legal Opinion

Distributing Corp. v. . Maxwell, Comr. of Revenue

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 11, 1935PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEVIN, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Civil action to recover license tax, alleged to have been illegally collected.

The complaint alleges:

1. That on or about 1 June, 1933, the plaintiff paid to the defendant Commissioner of Revenue $1,250 annual Schedule B license tax, as assessed under the Revenue Act of 1933, for the privilege of distributing moving picture films in North Carolina, which tax is discriminatory and unlawful.

2. That said payment was made under compulsion, in that printed notice was received by plaintiff from defendant to the effect that doing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Phifer v. . BerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. Rotan v. . StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Garysburg Manufacturing Co. v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Maxwell, Comr. of Revenue v. . HinsdaleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Bunn v. . Maxwell, Comr. of RevenueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Kirby v. . ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Kirby v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. State ex rel. Employment Security Commission v. KermonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Citizens Bank of Marshall v. GahaganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API