Kirby v. Reynolds
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
.ClaeksoN, J.
We think the demurrer of defendants should have been sustained on the ground that “the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.” N. C. Code, 1935 (Michie), sec. 511 (6).
0. S., 535 is as follows: “In the construction of a pleading for the purpose of determining its effect its allegations shall be liberally construed with a view to substantial justice between the parties.”
In Blackmore v. Winders, 144 N. C., 212 (215-16), speaking to the subject we find: “The uniform rule prevailing under our present system is that, for the purpose of ascertaining…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Blackmore v. . WindersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- State v. . PrinceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Brown v. . KinseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
- State v. . LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Childress v. AbelesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Cameron v. New Hanover Memorial Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Shope v. BoyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Spartan Equipment Co. v. Air Placement Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Leonard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.