Legal Opinion

Parker v. Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1892No. 7257PublishedCited by 62 opinions

Ho statement is necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

STAYTON, Chief Justice.

— This is an action of trespass to try title, instituted by appellant to recover a section of land patented to Simon Stark, from whom he deraigned title by regular chain of transfer.

Appellee, after having first made defense to the entire action, disclaimed as to all the land sued for except a strip of land 100 feet wide, extending through the grant, over which it claimed to have acquired right of way through proceedings in condemnation instituted on May 15, 1882, which was prior to the purchase of the land by appellant.

Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff for…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Housatonic Railroad v. Lee & Hudson RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  2. Whitely v. Platte CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  3. Thompson v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Chicago & Michigan Lake Shore Railroad v. SanfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Bush v. GoldenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1846

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Pearson v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. State v. Bristol Hotel Asset Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Coastal Industrial Water Authority v. Celanese Corp. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. NelsonTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Wooten v. State of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 1944

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API