Legal Opinion

Sinclair v. City of Dallas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 19, 1931No. 1112PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

This is a condemnation proceeding, and -the sole question to be determined is whether *466the appellants, as the owners of the property-sought to be condemned, filed their objections to the decision of the commissioners appointed to appraise the damages within the statutory time so as to authorize a trial in the county court. '

The city of Dallas, desiring to- condemn, for the purpose of widening a street, a part of the property owned by James B. Sinclair and wife, Mattie Lula Sinclair, and on which S. H. Broadnax held a lien, filed proper petition with the judge of the county court at law No. 2…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mingus, Receiver v. WadleyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Oilmen's Reciprocal Assn. v. FranklinTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Fitzgerald v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Hood v. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Pearson v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Hardy v. City of ThrockmortonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Rose v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  4. City of El Paso v. WardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  5. Patrick Media Group, Inc. v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1994

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API