Legal Opinion

Plant-Erickson v. Ditter

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 13, 1942No. Docket 129/714PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The bill prays for a decree for discovery and accounting. The facts are substantially that the complainant sometime before March, 1939, maintained and managed a beauty salon in Union City, New Jersey. Numbered among her patrons was the defendant Louise Ditter. In the course of the visits of Louise to complainant's shop, she confided to complainant that she had invested money in the stock market, and profited immensely thereby. She conveyed the inference that part of her profits were derived through "tips" from "Morgan Co." The picture of her successful stock market operations was beautifully…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wiley v. WirbelauerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  2. Cooperstein v. ShapiroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  3. Bowne v. WindsorNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  4. Stein v. George B. Spearin, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
  5. Cooperstein v. ShapiroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Silverstein v. LastNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  2. Charles Crissman Wendy Crissman Christine Crissman v. Dover Downs Entertainment Inc. Dover Downs, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  3. Charles Crissman Wendy Crissman Christine Crissman v. Dover Downs Entertainment Inc. Dover Downs, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API