Wiley v. Wirbelauer
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
Sometime in June, 1928, four silk dyeing establishments, which had been engaged in business in this state, merged into one company and now exist under the name of Associated Dyeing and Printing Corporation of Paterson. The defendant Wirbelauer became its president, and Wiley, the complainant, became its treasurer. The complainant alleges Wirbelauer collected part of a commission paid Abraham Axelrod, a promoter and broker, for services in effecting the merger, and fraudulently retains such proceeds, despite an agreement to pay him thirty-three and a third per cent. of the same. The defendant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jackson v. HooperNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1909
- Riehl v. RiehlNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
- Bowne v. WindsorNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
- Wolosin v. IavaroneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Braddock v. HinchmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Pike v. Wachovia Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Thorne's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Reichert EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Wittner v. MetzgerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
- Silverstein v. LastNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.