Charles Crissman Wendy Crissman Christine Crissman v. Dover Downs Entertainment Inc. Dover Downs, Inc
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1DissentRosenn, Circuit Judge
In 1993, Delaware departed from its role as solely a regulatory body of the three horse racing tracks in the state and decided to mount joint enterprises with each of *248them. Therefore, the expulsion without a hearing of the Crissmans, “licensees in good standing with the Harness Racing Commission for the State of Delaware,”1 after about twenty-five years as horse trainers and horse owners at the Dover Downs race track fairly may be attributed to the State under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.2 I, therefore, respectfully dissent.
I
The courts have never succeeded in formulating and applying a precise test for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Moose Lodge No. 107 v. IrvisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- The American Civil Liberties Union Of New Jersey v. Black Horse Pike Regional Board Of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.