Legal Opinion

State v. Muldrew

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 24, 2009No. 060647627, A135556PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for interfering with a police officer, ORS 162.247(1), and offensive physical contact prohibited, Portland City Code (PCC) 14A.40.040. He makes two assignments of error on appeal. First, he contends that Count 1 of the information, which charged him with interfering with a police officer, is deficient because it fails to allege that the crime occurred within the territorial jurisdiction of the court. We reject that assignment without discussion. He also assigns error to a trial court ruling that precluded him from cross-examining the arresting police…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HansenOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. HubbardOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. ShellyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ValleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. State v. LulayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. State v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. State v. FishCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. State v. CalderonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API