Legal Opinion

State v. Phillips

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 17, 2011No. D090271M; A141812PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.

Defendant appeals his convictions for assault in the fourth degree and driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion in limine to admit evidence of an altercation that he had with a police officer inside the Intoxilyzer room of the Hillsboro police station. That evidence was admissible, defendant argued, to impeach another officer — who had been present in the room but had not participated in the altercation — for bias against defendant. We review for errors of law, and affirm. State v. Hubbard, 297 Or 789, 800, 688 P2d…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. HubbardOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. HaugenOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Clevenger v. SchallhornOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. McCarty v. HEDGESOregon Supreme Court · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PrangeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. State v. NaudainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. State v. ZielinskiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  4. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  5. State v. Vasquez-ReyesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API