Legal Opinion

Maryland Automobile Insurance Fund v. Erie Insurance Exchange

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 28, 1995No. 1089PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SALMON, Judge.

The issue presented in this case is one of first impression. It requires us to interpret and implement Md.Code (1957,1994 Repl.Vol.), Art. 48A, § 543. Article 48A,1 § 543, deals, inter alia, with the coordination of insurance policies providing for personal injury protection (“PIP”) benefits under circumstances where two insurance policies potentially provide PIP benefits for the same injured party. The facts that give rise to this litigation are simple and undisputed.

FACTS. Samoil Fink was, on October 13, 1990, insured under an automobile insurance policy issued by Erie…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. GartelmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Harbor Island Marina v. BOARD OF CTY. COMMISSIONERS OF CALVERT CTY.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Travelers Insurance v. BentonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rouse-Fairwood Limited Partnership v. Supervisor of Assessments of Prince George's CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. Bennett v. State Department of Assessments & TaxationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. SeitzCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API