Legal Opinion

Rouse-Fairwood Limited Partnership v. Supervisor of Assessments of Prince George's County

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 7, 1998No. 793, Sept. Term, 1997PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLANDER, Judge.

This appeal focuses on the phrase “more intensive use” as it was used in Md.Code (1986, 1994 RepLVol., 1996 Cum.Supp.), § 8 — 209(h)(l)(ii) of the Tax-Property Article (“T.P.”). 1 On December 1, 1994, the Supervisor of Assessments for Prince George’s County, appellee, imposed an agricultural transfer tax and penalty upon appellant, Rouse-Fairwood Limited Partnership (“Rouse”), in connection with three properties that appellant owned in Prince George’s County. The Maryland Tax Court upheld that determination on February 21, 1996, and, by order dated March 28, 1997, the Circuit…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  2. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. People's CounselCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Tucker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Oaks v. ConnorsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Ramsay, Scarlett & Co. v. Comptroller of TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Comptroller v. FC-GEN Operations Inv.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  2. Supervisor of Assessments v. Hartge Yacht Yard, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. Rouse-Fairwood Development Ltd. Partnership v. Supervisor of Assessments for Prince George's CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Read v. Supervisor of AssessmentsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Carriage Hill Cabin John, Inc. v. Maryland Health Resources Planning CommissionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API