Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Seitz

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 3, 1996No. 1477, Sept. Term, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLANDER, Judge.

Edward Seitz, appellee, was seriously injured when two vehicles collided, one of which was insured by Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, appellant, and the other of which was insured by Allstate Insurance Company. In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether one or both insurers are obligated to pay Personal Injury Protection (“PIP”) benefits to Seitz. Nationwide argues that only Allstate is liable, even though Allstate’s PIP policy limit is considerably less than the limit in Nationwide’s policy. Seitz asserts that he is entitled to recover the larger policy amount,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. GartelmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Atlantic Mutual Insurance v. KenneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. Management Personnel Services, Inc. v. SandefurCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dwayne Clay, M.D., P.C. v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API