Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1935No. 25340. En BancPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This action involves the character of the water, whether navigable or non-navigable, in Cow lake, sometimes called Lake Meridian. The lake is meandered. Upon testimony taken in open court, together with a view of the premises by the trial judge, the lake was found and adjudged to be non-navigable. The state has appealed.

The sole question in the case relates to the navigability of the water. “Navigability is always a question of fact.” Proctor v. Sim, 134 Wash. 606, 236 Pac. 114. The lake is small, being spoken of in the court’s findings as a “pond or lake being about a mile long and about a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Harrison v. FiteCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  3. Griffith v. HolmanWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Proctor v. SimWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Watkins v. DorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  2. Washington Security Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Lefevre v. Washington Monument & Cut Stone Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Purdy v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Lefevre v. Washington Monument & Cut Stone Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API