Legal Opinion

Bundy v. United States District Court for the District of Nevada

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 28, 2016No. 16-72275PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BYBEE, Circuit Judge:

Attorney Larry Klayman applied to be admitted pro hac vice in the high-profile criminal trial of Cliven Bundy. The district court denied his application without prejudice. Bundy has now asked this court for a *1034writ of mandamus to force the district court to admit Klayman. We decline to do so. Under our decisions, the district court had more than ample cause to turn down Klayman’s application: he is involved in an ethics proceeding before the District. of Columbia Bar, and he was not candid with the court about the status of those proceedings; he disclosed that he…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Ex Parte FaheySupreme Court of the United States · 1947

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Ryan Karnoski v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  2. Chad Barnes v. Sea Hawaii Rafting, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. U.S. Dist. Court for the Dist. of Or. (In re United States)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. Bundy v. United States District Court for District of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. Reporters Comm. for Freedom Press v. Fed. Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API