Legal Opinion

Tapetes Luxor, S.A. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 7, 1964No. Reap. Dec. 10866; Entry No. 1128, etcPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

The merchandise involved in these oases, consolidated at the trial, consists of wool hooked rugs, manufactured in Mexico and exported to the United States through the port of Laredo, Tex. The dates of exportation range from July 26, 1956, through February 27, 1959.

The merchandise exported prior to February 27, 1958, was appraised on the basis of cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402(f) of the Tariff Act of 1980, and the merchandise exported after that date was appraised on the basis of export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Batten & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  2. United States v. HerrmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
  3. Delmonico International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  4. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  5. Daniel F. Young, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tapetes Luxor, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API