Neely v. Buster
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff as administrator of the estate of Wilbur F. Earl, deceased, who died intestate on -December 29, 1915. Plaintiff’s intestate was the grandfather and adoptive father of the defendant, Ethel Stella May Buster.
Wilbur F. Earl, something more than a year before his death, namely, on September 11, 1914, signed and acknowledged and left with his attorney, Henry M. Hurd, Esq., a deed to the property in controversy, wherein his granddaughter, Mrs. Buster, is named as the grantee. The deed, which- was without any pecuniary consideration, recites that it is made for love…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hibberd v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Sneathen v. SneathenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Standiford v. StandifordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- Carr v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Rivard v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Kalt v. YoungworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Smith v. LombardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Hahn v. HahnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Herman v. MortensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.