Legal Opinion

People v. Wilkison

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 17, 1916No. Crim. No. 477PublishedCited by 20 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San" Bernardino County, and from an order denying a new trial. J. W. Curtis, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Defendant was charged with having set fire to a pile of baled hay which was owned by a corporation. His conviction followed, after which a motion for a new trial was made. The appeal is taken from a judgment of imprisonment, and also from the order denying the motion for a new trial.

The section under which defendant was prosecuted provides in part as follows (Pen. Code, sec. 600): “Every person who willfully and maliciously burns any . . . stack of hay or grain or straw of any kind, or any pile of baled hay or straw, . . . not the property of such person, is punishable, . . . ” etc. One…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. AmmermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Davis v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
  3. People v. CummingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. People v. DiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. People v. MyringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. NewellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. State v. DixsonMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. People v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. State v. DavisMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. People v. ConsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API