Legal Opinion

McCallum v. B. O.R.R. Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1942No. 26345. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff, William Wallace McCallum, who is licensed to practice law in this State, instituted this suit in the superior court of Cook county against the defendant, the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, to recover an amount he claims lost by reason of the defendant's failure to recognize and protect his lien for attorney's fees in a claim which defendant settled with plaintiff's client, Lucy Burton, administratrix of the estate of Harvey Burton, deceased. The trial court entered a judgment for defendant which the Appellate Court affirmed. (310 Ill. App. 189. ) The case is here for further…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Standidge v. Chicago Railways Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Juilliard v. MayIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Forsyth v. BarnesIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Noell v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  5. Forsythe v. BeveridgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1869

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McKee-Berger-Mansueto, Inc. v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  2. Mitchell v. BurnettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  3. Process Color Plate Co. v. Chicago Urban Transportation DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. Rozycke v. SrokaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  5. Alex Peresipka v. Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway Company, Michael A. Gerrard, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API