Legal Opinion

Forsythe v. Beveridge

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1869PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Chicago; the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lawrence

Hurd, Booth and Kreamer, as attorneys of Ainsworth, obtained a judgment in the superior court of Chicago, against Turner and Nichols. The judgment was assigned to Forsythe, the appellant herein, and the money having been collected by Beveridge, the sheriff, and appellee herein, Forsythe seeks a rule upon him for its payment. This is resisted by Hurd, Booth and Kreamer, who claim an attorney’s lien upon the judgment, to the extent of their fees in the litigation resulting in its recovery. The superior court sustained their claim, and directed the money to be paid into court, there to remain…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rooney v. . Second Avenue Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Warfield v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1863
  3. Case of Widmier, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1873

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Fillmore v. WellsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  2. Ross v. ScannellWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Sanders v. SeelyeIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. ThacherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  5. McCallum v. B. O.R.R. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API