Legal Opinion

Process Color Plate Co. v. Chicago Urban Transportation District

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 25, 1984No. 83-900PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

Petitioner, Keck, Mahin & Cate, a law firm, appeals from a trial court order denying the enforcement of petitioner’s attorney’s lien served upon the Chicago Urban Transportation District, a municipal corporation. On appeal petitioner raises the following issues: (1) whether the district interfered with contracts between petitioner and its clients; (2) whether the district’s act of settling directly with petitioner’s clients rendered the district liable for petitioner’s attorney fees; and (3) whether petitioner’s attorney’s lien is enforceable against the assets of a municipal corporation.

Initi…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hamer v. KirkIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Hoffman v. LehnhausenIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Saltiel v. OlsenIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Rosemont Building Supply, Inc. v. Illinois Highway Trust AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Anastos v. O'BRIENAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. Philip Morris, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re Chicago Flood LitigationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  3. Lewsader v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  4. Wolff v. Ampacet Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  5. City of Chicago v. KorshakAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API