Legal Opinion

Alex Peresipka v. Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway Company, Michael A. Gerrard, Intervening

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 14, 1956No. 11533_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAJOR, Circuit Judge.

This proceeding involves a claim by intervening petitioner (referred to as Gerrard or intervenor) for attorney’s fees and attorney’s lien. Alex Peresipka (referred to as plaintiff) brought suit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana against the Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway Company (referred to as the railroad or defendant) to recover damages under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S. C.A. § 51 et seq. for injuries sustained while an employee of defendant. After a $25,000 judgment for plaintiff was affirmed by this court, 217…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hughes v. FetterSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Miller v. TiffanySupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  3. Baker v. BakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Wabash Railroad Co. v. HassettIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  5. George v. HaasIllinois Supreme Court · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Charles Alfred Gaines v. Dixie Carriers, Inc. v. Plotkin, Sapir & Bradley, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  2. American Metrocomm Corp. v. Duane Morris & Heckscher LLP (In Re American Metrocomm Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2002
  3. Albina Engine & Machine Works, Inc. v. AbelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  4. The Clarion Corporation v. American Home Products Corporation and Lehman BrothersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  5. Thibodeau v. Foremost InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API