Legal Opinion
Glen Holly Entertainment Inc. v. Tektronix Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 12, 2003No. 01-56447PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR ' REHEARING EN BANC AND AMENDED OPINION
TROTT, Circuit Judge.
ORDER
The Opinion filed on September 9, 2003, and published at 343 F.3d 1000 (9th Cir. 2003) is amended as follows:
Footnote 4 appearing on page 1013 is deleted and replaced by new footnote 4, which reads as follows:
Nor is it (1) Hairston v. Pacific 10 Conference, 101 F.3d 1315 (9th Cir.1996) (where antitrust standing was questionable and where the plaintiffs failed to “offer even the thinnest reed of support to meet their burden of proof that the defendants…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Amgen Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
- Aventis Environmental Science USA LP v. Scotts Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Stanislaus Food Products Co. v. USS-POSCO IndustriesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
- New Mexico Oncology & Hematology Consultants, Ltd. v. Presbyterian Healthcare ServicesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- Glen Holly Entertainment Inc. v. Tektronix Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.