Legal Opinion

State v. . Wynne

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 15, 1909PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Peebles, J., April Term, 1909, of Washington.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

The indictment is as follows: “The jurors for the State, upon their oaths, present: That Enoch 'Wynne, late of the county of Washington, on the_day of February, in the year of our Lord one thousand nine hundred and nine, with force and arms, at and in the county aforesaid, unlawfully and willfully did sell spirituous liquors by the small measure to Alex. Weaver and Alonzo Wynne, said sale having been made in manner as follows, to-wit: Said Enoch Wynne ordered, at request of said Alonzo Wynne and Alex. Weaver, from Norfolk, Ya., in a single shipment, in two separate bottles of whiskey for each…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. . ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. State v. . DardenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. State v. Piner.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. MuskellyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  4. State v. AbernathySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API