State v. Abernathy
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.
Before pleading to the warrant defendant moved to quash it on two grounds: (1) It fails to allege a criminal offense, and (2) the warrant after charging careless and reckless driving of an automobile in violation of G.S. 20-140, then specified what defendant did, that this had the effect of limiting the charge in the warrant to these specific acts alleged in the warrant, and these specific acts do not constitute the careless and reckless driving of an automobile within the intent and meaning of G.S. 20-140.
The warrant charges the offense of careless and reckless driving of an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. . ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- State v. . GuestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- State v. . DardenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- State v. WallaceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. RussellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. LinkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. LancasterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2023