Legal Opinion

Jewett v. Pudlo

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 1, 1934PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

This is an action of tort to recover damages for personal injuries received by the plaintiff in an automobile accident through the alleged negligence of the defendants. The defendants Cardinal and Monette are partners under the firm name and style of Vermont Food Sales Company. Defendant Pudlo was an employee of the partners. The accident was caused by the negligence of defendant Pudlo in the operation of a truck owned by the partners while he was acting within the scope of his employment. There was a trial by jury and a verdict and judgment against all three defendants.

At tbe time of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. PrenticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Maisenbacker v. Society ConcordiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  3. Wellman v. MeadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
  4. Ploof v. PutnamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1910
  5. Sparrow v. Vermont Savings BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1921

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Healy, Admr. v. MooreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1936
  2. Domina Ex Rel. Domina v. PrattSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940
  3. Raymond v. CapobiancoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1935
  4. Benway v. HooperSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  5. Judd v. ChallouxSupreme Court of Vermont · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API