Legal Opinion

Judd v. Challoux

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 3, 1944PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, C. J.

This is an action in tort, brought under the provisions of P. L. 4838, to recover the penalty specified therein for wilfully removing a gate from a pent road. The jury found the defendant guilty of ten separate infractions of the statute and assessed him the maximum amount of $5. for each offense. The cause is here upon his exceptions.

The court instructed the jury that the road in question is a pent road, and the correctness of this ruling is the subject of the first exception to- be considered. The undisputed evidence showed that the road branches off the main, highway-between the Towns of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Healy, Admr. v. MooreSupreme Court of Vermont · 1936
  2. Jewett v. PudloSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Town of Springfield v. NewtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1947
  2. Perrin v. Town of BerlinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  3. Cone v. DrohatSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952
  4. Schenfeld v. LawlorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API