Legal Opinion

Sparrow v. Vermont Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 8, 1921PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Action ok Tort for the malicious prosecution of a civil suit. Plea, the general issue. Trial by jury at the March Term, 1919, Washington County, Fish, J., presiding. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. Both parties excepted. The opinion states the case. On the question of exemplary damages, the actual wealth of the defendant may be shown.

Read the full summary

Action ok Tort for the malicious prosecution of a civil suit. Plea, the general issue. Trial by jury at the March Term, 1919, Washington County, Fish, J., presiding. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. Both parties excepted. The opinion states the case. On the question of exemplary damages, the actual wealth of the defendant may be shown. Rea v. Harrington, 58 Vt. 188; McCarty v. Miskeen, 22 Minn. 20; Peck v. Small, 35 Minn. 466; Webb v. Gilman, 80 Me. 177; Frye V. Bennett, 4 Duer, 247. When the question of exemplary damages is not in the case, reference to the financial situation of the…

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.

In 1903, Harriet A. Bailey, late of Montpelier, brought suit against the defendant to recover certain funds deposited by and for her in the defendant’s bank. This action was returnable to the Washington county court, wherein it was continued from term to term until 1906, when Mrs. Bailey, in order to secure information regarding -the deposits, started proceedings for taking the depositions of the officers and trustees of the Bank. Thereupon, the Bank brought a bill in chancery in Wind-ham County against Mrs. Bailey, and therein secured a temporary injunction restraining her from taking the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Stanford v. . Grocery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Closson v. StaplesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1869
  3. Barron v. MasonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858
  4. Malone v. BelcherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  5. Driggs v. BurtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1871

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Sanders v. Daniel International Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  2. Brueckner v. Norwich UniversitySupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  3. Hilder v. St. PeterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  4. Sulkowska v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  5. Shortle v. Central Vermont Public Service Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API