Legal Opinion

Clark County Agricultural Credit Corp. v. Hiim

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1934No. 24451. Department OnePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Millard, J. —

Alleging that, as its secretary, Ordin A. Hiim received chattel mortgage payments which he converted to his own use, plaintiff mortgagee commenced an action against its employee and the latter’s surety to recover the amount misappropriated. Answering jointly, the defendants pleaded the general issue. Trial of the cause to the court resulted in judgment in favor of the plaintiff on two of its three causes of action. Defendants have appealed.

Despondent, a domestic corporation, was engaged in the business, of lending money upon the security of cattle and other farm chattels. Ordin…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McNeff v. CapistranWashington Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Boyle v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Haveman v. BeulowWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Morse v. McGradyWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Sinko v. SinkoWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Petty Et Ux. v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API