Legal Opinion

McNeff v. Capistran

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1922No. 17003PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

— The appellants, McNeff, are engaged in the business of buying and selling hops. The respondents, Capistran, are hop growers. On May 20, 1921, the parties entered into a written contract, wherein the appellants agreed to buy of the respondents, and the respondents agreed to sell to the appellants, at seventy-five cents per pound, six thousand pounds of the hops to be grown by them on a certain described tract of land during the year named. The contract provided that the hops should be “of prime quality, i. e., of sound condition, good and even color, fully matured, but not over-ripe, flaky,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dustan v. . McAndrewNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Todd v. . GambleNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Acme Food Co. v. OlderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Dunlap v. Seattle National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Wintermute v. CarnerWashington Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Charles J. Frank, Inc. v. Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  2. Finney v. FARMERS INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  3. Independent School District No. 35 v. A. Hedenberg & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  4. Pedersen v. KlinkertWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Harrison v. Consolidated Holding Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API