Haveman v. Beulow
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGrady, J.
This action was instituted by the plaintiffs to recover damages resulting from the pollution of the water of their wells by refuse matter from the dehydrating plant of defendants and to secure injunctive relief. The court awárded each of the plaintiffs* a money judgment, enjoined the maintenance of a nuisance and directed its abatement.
Material facts found by the court are as follows: The respondents own and reside upon tracts of farm land in Whatcom county. On each tract is a well furnishing water for domestic purposes. One well is fifteen feet deep and has a concrete casing and cover. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hardman v. YounkersWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Union Oil & Mining Co. v. BowmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Brown v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1931
- Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. CarmichaelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
- Interstate Public Service Co. v. Weiss, Admr.Indiana Supreme Court · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Miotke v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Branch v. Western Petroleum, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
- Barci v. Intalco Aluminum Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Boise City v. Better Homes, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952
- In Re the Estate of DandWashington Supreme Court · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.