Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. Montgomery

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 23, 1970No. 14PublishedCited by 89 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan

This is a companion case to No. 62, Goldberg v. Kelly, ante, p. 254. It is a class action brought by all recipients *281of old age benefits who are subject to California welfare termination provisions. A three-judge District Court for the Northern District of California held that the California procedure for pre-termination review in welfare cases satisfies the requirements of the Due Process Clause, 296 F. Supp. 138 (1968), and we noted probable jurisdiction, 394 U. S. 970 (1969). This procedure requires notice to the recipient of the proposed discontinuance or suspension at least three days…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wheeler v. MontgomeryDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1969

3Cited by89 opinions

  1. Parham v. J. R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Wyman v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Escalera v. New York City Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  4. Almenares v. WymanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  5. Bundo v. City of Walled LakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1976

84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API