Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 25, 2003No. E032585PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GAUT, J.

Plaintiff Michael D. Freeman appeals judgment entered in favor of defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Wal-Mart), after the trial court sustained Wal-Mart’s demurrer and motion for summary judgment.

This action arises from plaintiff suing Wal-Mart for charging customers a service fee if they do not use their Wal-Mart shopping cards within 24 months. Plaintiff alleges in his complaint that the service fee is unconscionable and thus unlawful under Civil Code section 1770, subdivision (a)(19) of the Consumers Legal Remedies Act. Plaintiff also alleges the service fee violates section…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  5. A & M PRODUCE CO. v. FMC Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Belton v. Comcast Cable Holdings, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Walnut Producers of California v. Diamond Foods, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  3. Davidson & Associates, Inc. v. Internet GatewayDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2004
  4. Lemon v. Harlem Globetrotters International, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2006
  5. Rutgard v. City of L.A.California Court of Appeal · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API