Legal Opinion · Dissent

Park Construction Co. v. Independent School District No. 32

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 17, 1941No. 32,440Published

1Dissent

I agree with the dissent written by Mr. Justice Peterson. I do not believe that the doctrine of Holdridge v. Stowell,39 Minn. 360, 40 N.W. 259, is bad law or that it should be discarded; nor do I feel that such cases as Gasser v. Sun Fire Office, 42 Minn. 315, 44 N.W. 252; Whitney v. National Masonic Ace. Assn. 52 Minn. 378, 54 N.W. 184; Aaberg v. Minnesota Com'l Men's Assn. 152 Minn. 478,189 N.W. 434; Abramowitz v. Continental Ins. Co. 170 Minn. 215,212 N.W. 449; and Glidden Co. v. Retail Hardware Mut. F. Ins. Co. 181 Minn. 518, 233 N.W. 310, 77 A.L.R. 616, should be overruled, particularly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gasser v. Sun Fire OfficeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  2. Whitney v. National Masonic Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. Glidden Co. v. Retail Hardware Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Holdridge v. StowellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  5. Abramowitz v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API