Legal Opinion
Glidden Co. v. Retail Hardware Mutual Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 28, 1930No. Nos. 27,939, 27,940, 27,941PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
Action on an award or appraisal made, pursuant to policies of fire insurance issued by the defendant insurance companies. A verdict for something over $77,000 was directed for the plaintiffs by the court. It was apportioned by the court’s findings, $49,088.48 against the defendant Retail Hardware Mutual Fire Insurance Company of Minnesota; $19,250.32 against the defendant Minnesota Implement Mutual Fire Insurance Company of Minnesota; and $8,662.66 against the defendant Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance Company of Wisconsin. The defendants appeal and present for review the judgment in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Coppage v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Tyson & Brother v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance v. Glidden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Park Construction Co. v. Independent School District No. 32Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Knutson v. LasherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Officer v. American Eagle Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
- Johnson v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.