Holdridge v. Stowell
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by Ida C. Stowell from an order of the district court for ' Eamsey county, Brill, J., presiding, setting aside an award.
1Opinion of the CourtGtlfillan, C. J.
The parties entered into an agreement in writing to submit a certain matter in difference between them to the arbitrament of two persons named, and such other person as might be chosen by those two. The agreement was in the form, (except as to the two arbitrators named choosing a third,) and was acknowledged in the manner, prescribed by statute. Gen. St. 1878, c. 89. The arbitrators had a hearing, and an award was signed by two, (one of those named in the agreement of submission not signing,) and filed with the clerk of the district court. All there is to show the selection of a third…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barney v. FlowerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Franklin Mining Co. v. PrattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Galloway v. GibsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Sargent v. Inhabitants of HampdenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1850
3Cited by16 opinions
- Park Construction Co. v. Independent School District No. 32Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Knutson v. LasherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Dore v. Southern Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Independent School District No. 35 v. A. Hedenberg & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- In re the Arbitration between Kreiss & HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.