Legal Opinion
Abramowitz v. Continental Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 11, 1927No. 25,695PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Consolidated actions on two policies of fire insurance covering household goods only. After a verdict for plaintiff, defendants appeal from the order denying their alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.
The fire occurred June 2, 1924. June 3 the insured submitted sworn statements of the loss, and plaintiff forthwith demanded an appraisal, naming Mr. W. C. Bogers as his appraiser. The adjuster for the insurers responded by admitting there was disagreement as to amount of the loss and named Mr. Thomas C. Daggett as- their appraiser. Mr. Daggett, being of counsel for the insurers, very…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Matter of Berkovitz v. . Arbib HoulbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Hamilton v. Liverpool, London & Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Mosness v. German-American Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Hood v. HartshornMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance v. Glidden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Park Construction Co. v. Independent School District No. 32Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Aetna Cas. & Sur. v. Ins. Comm'rCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Itasca Paper Co. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Dimke v. FinkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.