Legal Opinion

Matter of Braiter v. Addie Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1940PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

In the absence of proof that an employment certificate, vacation work permit or a certificate of age was on file in the place of claimant’s employment (Labor Law [Cons. Laws, ch. 31], §§ 131, 132), it is no defense to a claim for double compensation under section 14-a of the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 67), by a claimant employed in violation of section 131 of the Labor Law, that the employer was not negligent in determining the age of the claimant at the time of employment. (Matter of Davidowicz v. Klipstein, 272 N. Y. 543; Matter of Kociolowicz v. Tonawanda Corrugated Box…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Claim of Kociolowicz v. Tonawanda Corrugated Box Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  2. Matter of Davidowicz v. KlipsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1936

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Claim of Sackolwitz v. Charles Hamburg & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
  2. Halfacre v. Paragon Bridge & Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Ashe v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Willis v. StoreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  5. Claim of Carney v. Williams Press Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API