Legal Opinion

Roundy v. Stewart

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 5, 1984No. 1 CA-CIV 6186PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JACOBSON, Chief Judge.

Appellant, the City of Phoenix, appeals from jury verdicts rendered against it and finding in favor of the plaintiffs, the Roun-dys, and in favor of the defendant and cross-claimant, Glenn Stewart. The City raises two issues in this appeal:

1. Whether the trial court erred in denying its motion for a new trial because the jury verdicts were inconsistent.

2. Whether the trial court erred in allowing several expert witnesses to testify as to. how the accident occurred.

We find no error and affirm the judgment below.

This appeal arises out of an action filed by the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Layton v. RochaArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Heimke v. MunozArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Manhattan-Dickman Construction Co. v. ShawlerArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Eldredge v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Winchester v. PalkoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Souza v. Fred Carries Contracts, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  2. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  3. State v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API