Legal Opinion

Manhattan-Dickman Construction Co. v. Shawler

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1976No. 12589-PRPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Vice Chief Justice.

This action was brought by Wayne T. Shawler and Michael F. Kumler to recover damages for injuries sustained during the course of construction of a coliseum at the State Fairgrounds in Phoenix, Arizona. Following trial, verdicts were returned in favor of plaintiffs against Manhattan-Dick-man Construction Company and Allison Steel Manufacturing Company. On appeal and cross-appeal, the Court of Appeals by memorandum decision reversed, holding that the evidence was not sufficient to support a finding of negligence against either Manhattan-Dickman or Allison Steel.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Austin v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Layton v. RochaArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  3. In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Dingman v. AF Mattock CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Heimke v. MunozArizona Supreme Court · 1970

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Clary Insurance Agency v. DoyleAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Estate of Reinen v. Northern Arizona Orthopedics, Ltd.Arizona Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Lewis v. N.J. Riebe Enterprises, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Maxwell v. Aetna Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. Warner v. Southwest Desert Images, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API