Legal Opinion

Winchester v. Palko

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 19, 1972No. 1 CA-CIV 1756PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAIRE, Chief Judge,

Division 1.

On this appeal the defendant-appellant seeks reversal of the trial court’s entry of judgment for the plaintiff for damages incurred by plaintiff as a result of a collision between plaintiff’s motorcycle and defendant’s automobile. Defendant contends that the judgment must be reversed because the trial court gave imminent peril and contributory negligence instructions which ■were allegedly improper and highly prejudicial.

The automobile-motorcycle accident which gave rise to this litigation occurred .at the “T” intersection of North Tatum Boulevard and Clearwater…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Layton v. RochaArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Heimke v. MunozArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Webb v. HardinArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Gilbert v. QuinetArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Anderson v. GobeaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Manhattan-Dickman Construction Co. v. ShawlerArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Anderson v. MunizCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  3. Rimondi v. BriggsArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Williams v. ThudeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  5. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. ChurchCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API