Winchester v. Palko
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
HAIRE, Chief Judge,
Division 1.
On this appeal the defendant-appellant seeks reversal of the trial court’s entry of judgment for the plaintiff for damages incurred by plaintiff as a result of a collision between plaintiff’s motorcycle and defendant’s automobile. Defendant contends that the judgment must be reversed because the trial court gave imminent peril and contributory negligence instructions which ■were allegedly improper and highly prejudicial.
The automobile-motorcycle accident which gave rise to this litigation occurred .at the “T” intersection of North Tatum Boulevard and Clearwater…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Layton v. RochaArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Heimke v. MunozArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Webb v. HardinArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- Gilbert v. QuinetArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Anderson v. GobeaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Manhattan-Dickman Construction Co. v. ShawlerArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Anderson v. MunizCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Rimondi v. BriggsArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- Williams v. ThudeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. ChurchCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.