Legal Opinion

Jurgens v. Eads

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 19, 1978No. 14855PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mills

We grapple here with contingent and vested remainders, executory interests and divestment.

In short — we affirm.

C. F. Eads died testate on February 25,1950. By the terms of his will he gave his wife, Ella Eads, a life estate in his real estate and gave the remainder to his brother, John D. Eads, in trust. The terms directed the trustee to rent the real estate during the interim between the date of death of Ella Eads and the date of sale of the real estate which was to be by public auction within one year from the death of Ella Eads. After paying expenses, the proceeds were then to be…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Carter v. CarterIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  2. City of DeKalb v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  3. Wiener v. SeversonIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Pape v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Stotlar v. StotlarAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bissett v. GoochAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. Estate of Michalak v. RobertAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  3. Putz v. SchulteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  4. In Re Marriage of UphoffAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  5. Morgan v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API