Legal Opinion

Putz v. Schulte

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 11, 1982No. 80-519PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jones

The sole issue presented in this appeal is whether the trial court had jurisdiction to enter a post-judgment order expunging from its judgment a provision that defendants were to refund to plaintiff a deposit of $3000 made upon a real estate purchase agreement. We are asked to re-examine the holding of this court in Stotlar v. Stotlar (1977), 50 Ill. App. 3d 790, 365 N.E.2d 1097, that a party who seeks post-judgment relief must file a post-trial motion within 30 days after entry of the judgment, or within a court-authorized extension thereof, and that the time for filing of the post-trial…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Deckard v. JoinerIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  2. City of DeKalb v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  3. Weaver v. BoltonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  4. Sigma Alpha Epsilon Fraternity & Illinois Psi Omega Ass'n v. SchwarzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965
  5. In Re Marriage of ParelloAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. Sunbelt Tool Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  2. Matich v. GerdesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  3. Minfield v. BernardiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. Predny v. Village of Park ForestAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Burnidge Corp. v. StelfordAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API