Legal Opinion

Kravas v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 23, 1939No. 152PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.

This is a suit by the plaintiffs, citizens of Pennsylvania, against the defendant, The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, a New Jersey corporation, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been suffered by the plaintiff Katherine Kravas, when she fell on cellar doors in the sidewalk in front of a storeroom at 21 Magee Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Under Rule 14(a) of the Federal Rules for Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, third-party complaints were filed against Joseph Davis and the Peoples-Pittsburgh Trust Company,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Murray v. Pittsburgh Athletic Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Bossard v. McGwinnDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Jones v. WohlgemuthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Crum v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1939

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. United States v. AcordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  2. Sheppard v. Atlantic States Gas Co. of Pennsylvania, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  3. Gustafson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. Morrell v. United Air Lines Transport CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
  5. Gray v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1940

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API