Legal Opinion
Robert G. TICE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LAMPERT YARDS, INC., Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 6, 1985No. 84-1325PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFEY, Circuit Judge.
The jury found that the defendant, Lam-pert Yards, Inc., had discriminated against the plaintiff, Robert G. Tice, in dismissing him because of age. Upon review the dis trict court, however, found that there was insufficient evidence to support this verdict and granted Lampert Yards’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Tice now appeals the district court’s decision. We affirm.
I
Tice, the millshop foreman for Lampert Yards’ Sturgeon Bay facility, was terminated by Lampert Yards on July 17, 1980 at the age of 57. Following his dismissal he filed a charge of age…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Frank L. LOEB, Plaintiff, v. TEXTRON, INC., Et Al., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- Arzel Haley v. Boniface Gross, Lieutenant McKee and Michael EllisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Volk v. ColerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Palmer RAMSEY, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. AMERICAN AIR FILTER CO., INC., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Cygnar v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Frank James v. Milwaukee County and Franklin LotterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.