Legal Opinion

Land v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 27, 1997No. Cong. Ref. No. 1-88PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REPORT OF REVIEW PANEL

2Per curiam

In this congressional reference case,1 the review panel is presented with plaintiffs’ challenge, on legal and factual grounds, to *233the Report of the Hearing Officer which concluded that plaintiffs had not demonstrated any legal or equitable claim against the United States and that an award of damages to plaintiffs, Larry Land, et al., would be a gratuity.2 After reviewing the record, the parties’ briefs, and hearing oral argument, the review panel affirms the report of the hearing officer.

Briefly, plaintiffs claim they suffered personal injuries and property damage as a…

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Fontenot v. Mesa Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  3. Milmark Services, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. L.E.A. Dynatech, Inc., Plaintiff/counterdefendant/appellee v. Edward F. Allina and Meter Treater, Inc., Defendants/counterplaintiffs-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Baskett v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Herrington v. LEAF RIVER FOREST PROD.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Land Grantors in Henderson, Union v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. CRAIG L. RUSSELL v. CALL/D, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Brandi Herrington v. Leaf River Forest Products, Inc., A ForeignMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Land Grantors in Henderson, Union v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API