Holland v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greiman
Defendant State Farm Insurance appeals from an adverse decision rendered subsequent to a bench trial. The trial court held defendant violated the Illinois Insurance Code by not offering optional uninsured motorist coverage when plaintiff purchased an automobile insurance policy in October 1983. Ill. Rev. Stat. 1983, ch. 73, par. 755a — 2.
We affirm the trial court’s holding.
The issues on appeal are (1) whether plaintiffs met their burden of showing defendant failed to provide plaintiff with the information required for offering the optional coverage (Cloninger v. National General Insurance Co.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cloninger v. National General InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
- Tucker v. Country Mutual Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- MBL (USA) Corp. v. DiekmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Tomaso v. Plum Grove BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- Krska v. Allstate Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Glater v. FabianichAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Harrington v. American Family Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Meadows v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Caratini v. Casualty InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Harrington v. American Family Mutual InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.