Legal Opinion · Dissent

Caratini v. Casualty Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 14, 1993No. 1 — 90—3636Published

1DissentJustice Greiman

Although I believed that the case was a close one at the time I concurred with the majority’s opinion, upon consideration of the meaningful petition for rehearing, I have determined that this court should have affirmed the trial court.

This appeal comes to us following a bench trial where the trial court entered a detailed order including its findings of fact and conclusions of law. It is well established that a trial court’s findings in a bench trial will not be disturbed unless they are against the manifest weight of the evidence which requires the opposite conclusion to be clearly evident.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cloninger v. National General InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Tucker v. Country Mutual Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. Trident Industrial Products Corp. v. American National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. Krska v. Allstate Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  5. Holland v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API