Caratini v. Casualty Insurance
Appellate Court of Illinois
1DissentJustice Greiman
Although I believed that the case was a close one at the time I concurred with the majority’s opinion, upon consideration of the meaningful petition for rehearing, I have determined that this court should have affirmed the trial court.
This appeal comes to us following a bench trial where the trial court entered a detailed order including its findings of fact and conclusions of law. It is well established that a trial court’s findings in a bench trial will not be disturbed unless they are against the manifest weight of the evidence which requires the opposite conclusion to be clearly evident.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cloninger v. National General InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
- Tucker v. Country Mutual Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Trident Industrial Products Corp. v. American National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Krska v. Allstate Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Holland v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.